The contradiction of flags

Commentary: The Contradiction of Flags – A Sociological Reflection

As a traveling sociologist, I encounter a broad spectrum of human behaviors and expressions. Some are amusing, others funny, some elicit a roll of the eyes, and a few are downright offensive. In the whenua I call home, I often find myself disagreeing with various perspectives, yet I firmly uphold the principle that every individual has the right to their views and to express them. However, I am also compelled to ask—does the concept of free expression have its limits?

Recently, I came across a jarring and deeply troubling sight: a property flying both the Nazi flag and the Tino Rangatiratanga flag. This juxtaposition struck me as not only contradictory but also as an affront to the memory of all who have suffered under the ideologies these flags represent.

The Nazi flag is globally recognized as a symbol of hate, oppression, and genocide. It carries with it the weight of historical atrocities that caused unimaginable pain to millions of people. To display this flag is to evoke the trauma of those who suffered and to perpetuate a legacy of division and hate.

The Tino Rangatiratanga flag, on the other hand, stands as a symbol of Māori sovereignty and resilience. It embodies hope, identity, and a vision of equity for the tangata whenua of New Zealand. To pair it with a symbol of hatred and oppression is not just offensive; it undermines the very essence of what the Tino Rangatiratanga flag represents.

As a sociologist seeking to understand the pain and suffering of whānau in this region, I view such an act as counterintuitive to the goal of social cohesion. It suggests a lack of understanding of the complex and nuanced issues at play in our society. Rather than fostering dialogue or advancing meaningful causes, it perpetuates a cycle of hate, division, and misunderstanding.

Adding to the offence is the misuse of the Tino Rangatiratanga flag. To my understanding, it stands for mana, justice, and the sovereignty of Māori as the tangata whenua of this land. Its misuse alongside a symbol of hate is not just incongruent but deeply disrespectful to those who have fought and continue to fight for equity and recognition.

In these uncertain times, it is more critical than ever to approach our expressions—whether through speech, actions, or symbols—with care and understanding. Free expression should not be weaponized to harm or incite division. Instead, it should serve as a tool to foster empathy, understanding, and the kind of dialogue that heals rather than wounds.

To fly these two flags side by side is not an act of free expression—it is a blatant affront to history, identity, and the pursuit of a more united and equitable future.

- Jessica